|
|
Post by Blue Train on Jun 2, 2015 14:56:07 GMT -5
I received comments (via track changes and comment bubbles in MS Word) on draft one of a book review from the journal editor. Is it best practice to turn in revised version w/ a similar "response to reviewer" document that I would send to a peer reviewed journal?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by curioustoo on Jun 26, 2015 11:50:15 GMT -5
bump. I'm curious to hear the answer to this too!
|
|
|
|
Post by I didn't on Jun 26, 2015 21:32:50 GMT -5
Have only done two book reviews so far but in both instances I did not include any additional documents just the revised review. I don't see any reason to do this unless it is explicitly requested.
|
|
|
|
Post by Schmee on Jul 11, 2015 0:39:57 GMT -5
Also wouldn't do that. If there's a need to explain any changes, use bubbles.
|
|
