|
|
Post by med socer on Oct 3, 2012 14:49:27 GMT -5
Although QHR has an impact factor of 2, it's a bureaucratic nightmare once the manuscript is accepted.
Although I published there I doubt I will submit there again in the near future.
|
|
|
|
Post by oh really on Oct 30, 2012 19:15:21 GMT -5
what happened?
in my experience the review process was great.
|
|
|
|
Post by yeah really on Nov 6, 2012 16:22:13 GMT -5
The amount of amazingly specific editing that authors have to do is really unacceptable (preferred word usage, etc). They should have copy editors that do the minutae.
Furthermore, it was a long review process and even longer to get published, with a timeline that they refuse to communicate about.
|
|
|
|
Post by yes on Dec 9, 2012 10:59:48 GMT -5
The amount of amazingly specific editing that authors have to do is really unacceptable (preferred word usage, etc). They should have copy editors that do the minutae. Furthermore, it was a long review process and even longer to get published, with a timeline that they refuse to communicate about. I had a similar experience. After my article was accepted QHR said it had to be professionally copyedited to their picky picky style/formatting standards. They also refused to estimate a publication date. The review process for my paper was pretty standard, 2-3 months to get decision from editor. Happy to publish there but annoyed by the post-review mechanics of getting the paper in print. |
|
