|
|
Post by experience on Jun 21, 2012 18:44:48 GMT -5
Let's keep it rolling. Any experience with Sociological Perspectives?
|
|
|
|
Post by 2x on Jun 27, 2012 10:52:57 GMT -5
I've submitted here twice with a moderate amount of success.
Under old editors:
The first manuscript had 4 reviewers, with helpful feedback. Received an R&R after 3.5 months. Received conditional acceptance 1 month after revisions. Received Acceptance 2 weeks after final revisions.
Under new editors:
Three reviewers---1 had no idea what the paper was about and could not distinguish between independent and dependent variables...seriously. 1 review was positive, and 1 was negative.
|
|
|
|
Post by great on Jul 9, 2012 11:04:52 GMT -5
New editors are fabulous.
|
|
|
|
Post by runner on Oct 15, 2013 10:22:33 GMT -5
got a desk rejection in 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bump on Mar 11, 2014 18:37:11 GMT -5
Recent experiences? (length and number of reviews, etc)
|
|
|
|
Post by Recent on Mar 12, 2014 10:14:03 GMT -5
I submitted a manuscript in late 2012. R&R after 3 months with 3 solid and helpful reviews, substantial feedback from editor. Revision was accepted after 2.5 months, took about 7 months after that to appear in print. Hope this helps!
|
|
|
|
Post by helpful on Mar 13, 2014 23:01:52 GMT -5
thanks! (I was bump)
|
|
|
|
Post by recent on Jun 17, 2016 13:21:59 GMT -5
any recent experiences with this one? Number of reviews? Wait times to initial decision? Random insight? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by guest234 on Jun 22, 2016 16:52:53 GMT -5
Recently published there. Had three reviewers. All reviews were helpful and offered useful (and reasonable) suggestions. Took 3-4 months for initial response, received R&R, waited for another 1-2 months for decision after manuscript was sent back to two of the three original reviewers. Minor changes requested by editor after the two reviewers approved the RR changes. Manuscript was not sent out for second round of RR after those minor changes were made (editor just looked at them approved them and this stage took about two weeks).
|
|
|
|
Post by so-so on Feb 9, 2017 22:08:38 GMT -5
Turn around was quick (3 months for the reject) but reviews were horrible. The reviewers did not seem to have read the paper. Also, judging by the quality, I suspect they were graduate students.
|
|
